The non-binding resolution, approved by the UN General Assembly (UNGA) on Thursday, created a dangerous legal precedent and would not contribute to the cessation of hostilities in Syria, Russia’s envoy to the UN, Vitaliy Churkin, told newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta (RG).
“This decision of the General Assembly was not right ... we honestly believe that the General Assembly does not have the authority to establish such institutions,” said Churkin. “The Secretary General, however, has received corresponding instructions, and it looks like the new Secretary General will have to deal with the issue.”
- According to Churkin, it has apparently become a common and dangerous practice in the UN, when a flawed resolution which fails to get a consensus within the Security Council instead gets passed through the General Assembly. This is despite the fact that the issues currently under UNSC consideration should not be interfered with by the General Assembly, according to the UN Charter.
“This happens when some difficulties in the work of the UNSC show up. The resolutions, as a result, come to the General Assembly, though it should not happen according to the Charter,” Churkin said. The resolution basically contradicts not only the UN Charter but the basic principle of state sovereignty itself, blatantly interfering with the domestic affairs of a UN-member state.
“We find the draft resolution to be an unconstructive move, on both legal and political grounds,” Iran’s Deputy Ambassador to the UN Gholam-Hossein Dehqani said in New York on Wednesday.
- The whole idea of an “independent” institution that depends on “voluntary donations” to investigate alleged “war crimes” in Syria raises serious concerns, according to Churkin.
“The resolution states that the new structure will be based on voluntary contributions. That means in fact, that the one who’ll give money, sponsor this group will expect the results they desire. It will obviously be ‘anti-Damascus’ and ‘anti-Assad’ investigations,” the Russian diplomat said.
Such a resolution, while not being well thought-out or based on solid legal grounds, was easily adopted almost purely due to the emotions of the UN General Assembly's members.
“The General Assembly’s resolution is a result of everyone having nerves ‘naked’ regarding the Syrian issue. Many delegations are willing to vote in favor of anything, any resolution with a declared goal of ceasing hostilities in Syria,” Churkin told RG......../rt.com/news/371792-independent-un-team-syria-crimes/
[rt.com]
26/12/16
-
Related:
-
- US-led coalition airstrikes kill at least ten civilians in Raqqa
- Ten civilians, some of them children, killed in airstrike by US-led coalition in Raqqa
- US-Led Coalition Airstrike Kills 23 Civilians in Syria’s Raqqa
-
- Some 300 civilians may have died from the bombings: Amnesty urges US-led coalition to come clean about civilian deaths in Syria
- Washington-led International coalition acknowledges responsibility of killing tens of civilians in Manbej
- Syria calls on UN to condemn French aggression on civilians in north of Aleppo (More than 120 civilians by mistake)
- Implication de la Belgique dans la mort d'au moins 6 civils en Syrie: la Russie accuse toujours la Belgique, mais les numéros d'avions ne correspondent pas
FR
DE
ES
IT
RU
EU
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only News